Digital 395 project going full bore
...as the rash of construction along the highway corridor right now shows, the project is in full swing, both in Mono County and along much of the U.S. 395 corridor to Carson City.
...as the rash of construction along the highway corridor right now shows, the project is in full swing, both in Mono County and along much of the U.S. 395 corridor to Carson City.
windyscotty wrote:I got a call from the archaeologist. He is upset about what happened out there and described how the county told the construction people to keep moving over out of the road onto the shoulder. They did not like them blocking traffic.
Eventually, the excavator got over so far it was outside of where BLM told them to lay the line. That is when they entered into virgin territory.
So now the contractor is in a lot of trouble. The wagon rut was so obscure that nobody knew about it. I would have had to show them exactly where it was at. The archaeologists did survey the entire line, and it is really long. I can understand how they could miss this little goodie.
I am bummed I wasn't on top of it to see those guys out there and let BLM know before they got to the wagon rut.
That is the story of my life. I am always coming in after the damage is done.
I couldn't save the rut.
If avoidance is not possible, then
applicable parties will consult to find ways to minimize effects. If it is determined an adverse effect will
occur, the parties will consult to develop a treatment plan to avoid, minimize, or mitigate those effects.


SkierBob wrote:Makes me wonder what else they might not be aware of.
In the peoples quest for more bandwidth the over all feeling is a little culture and historical damage is ok as long as they can surf the web faster.

rphenry wrote:SkierBob wrote:Makes me wonder what else they might not be aware of.
In the peoples quest for more bandwidth the over all feeling is a little culture and historical damage is ok as long as they can surf the web faster.
Mitigation might take the flavor of putting up a website with panoramic "before" pictures of the construction sites that can then be viewed easily with the new bandwidth.


windyscotty wrote:Unfortunately, we do not have the before photos, because I never took any. That was funny!
"Was anyone on site aware of the historical nature of the ruts? Should they have been? Are they on any BLM/FS map or inventory? Was any consultation done?"
Nobody but myself knew where the rut was. I drove by it for 25 years and never saw it. There was no way the archaeologist would have found it. It was just too obscure. Not all the old wagon roads are mapped. Only a few guys like me know where they are. If I could have told Greg Haverstock, the BLM arch, about it, he would have made those guys tunnel under the rut.
But alas, I was too late.
This is not something to cry about. The mess they left on the road is.
In a big hurry to cause a big messed up delay.
The fault lies in that nobody was inspecting the contractors work until it was too late. That is the responsibility of the land agency. Contractors are out to make money and will cut any corner they can. They are notorious for leaving a mess behind after construction projects. Mining is a real bad example. One cleanup by the FS for a Tungsten Mill off the Buttermilk Rd. cost us $200,000. The mine owners just waltzed away and did not pay a cent for the cleanup. The no good, dirty rotten, stinking, sons of lousy...






windyscotty wrote:Do you care? I think not! You just want speed. Speed kills!



...He admitted that there have been some push backs and challenges, but things are still moving ahead. One of the hang-ups was a contention by the Bureau of Land Management that the Digital 395 crews had gone onto BLM land. Larry Primosch of BLM had told us that the Praxis crew apparently intruded into a Wilderness Study Area and outside the existing right of way. Ort said this issue is on the way to resolution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest